http://www.joeventures.com/archives/230 Always on the move Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:28:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://www.joeventures.com/archives/230#comment-126 Amber Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:25:36 +0000 http://www.joeventures.com/archives/230#comment-126 Well, then I'm with you on that. :) Well, then I’m with you on that.

]]> http://www.joeventures.com/archives/230#comment-125 Joe Winter Thu, 07 Jul 2005 06:01:11 +0000 http://www.joeventures.com/archives/230#comment-125 There's something to be said, though, for a hybrid approach. Perhaps this was a little too subtle in my writing, but the two approaches are by no means mutually exclusive. What I tried to argue is that a good dose of both is healthier for the brain. There’s something to be said, though, for a hybrid approach. Perhaps this was a little too subtle in my writing, but the two approaches are by no means mutually exclusive. What I tried to argue is that a good dose of both is healthier for the brain.

]]> http://www.joeventures.com/archives/230#comment-124 Amber Wed, 06 Jul 2005 23:39:19 +0000 http://www.joeventures.com/archives/230#comment-124 I disagree with the strength of weak ties theory. -Well, let me qualify that. I agree that that's the way you're going to get better "networking", for jobs, political action, etc. But what about personal quality of life? What about your emotional well-being? Having a few close friends who really know you is preferrable to me than having a bunch of acquaintances. I disagree with the strength of weak ties theory. -Well, let me qualify that. I agree that that’s the way you’re going to get better “networking”, for jobs, political action, etc. But what about personal quality of life? What about your emotional well-being? Having a few close friends who really know you is preferrable to me than having a bunch of acquaintances.

]]>