In the latest federal budget, our fair President made the decision to cut one of the most beneficial programs to come out of HUD, HOPE VI. The purpose of the program was to take the most distressed public housing projects in the nation, raze them, and build new mixed-income housing projects. Though there were some complaints that the program displaced many public housing residents, the program has made great strides in fixing a big problem: concentrated and isolated pockets of poverty in America’s inner cities.
Why place the focus on dispersing poverty? The theory is that when this happens poverty, crime, and social disorder all decrease while public school performance increases. This theory comes at least partly from a book by William Julius Wilson that documents what happens when poverty is concentrated and isolated in the inner cities.
After nearly a decade of HOPE VI and other means-tested government program reforms, it’s worth taking a look to see whether poverty is dispersing. A new report from the Brookings Institution shows that the 1990’s saw an incredible reversal in the trend of increasingly concentrated poverty that occured through the 1970’s and 80’s.
The number of people living in high-poverty neighborhoodsÑwhere the poverty rate is 40 percent or higherÑdeclined by a dramatic 24 percent, or 2.5 million people, in the 1990s. Concentrated povertyÑthe share of the poor living in high-poverty neighborhoodsÑdeclined among all racial and ethnic groups, especially African Americans. The number of high-poverty neighborhoods declined in rural areas and central cities, but suburbs experienced almost no change.
And so on. Check out the report and think about this: if we shouldn’t try solutions that have been tried before and don’t work, shouldn’t we give new solutions a chance especially when they show promising results?



. No Comment.


